What do you do as the state’s CIO?
The role of the state Chief Information Officer [CIO] here was established by Senate Bill 90, that was done last year. I think it was August. But
the funding was made effective in January of this year.
The role of this office is first of all to be the policy
for the governor on any technology issues. Just to
give you an example, the responsibility for all the
broadband activities in the state is now being shared
between my office and some remaining functions being
down by BTH [Business, Transportation and Housing Agency], ensuring that we have broadband connectivity for
homes and businesses across the state, as well as ensuring
that we have.
Second, we have been working with the Governor’s office on education data, working with Superintendant
O’Connell’s office and working with the Governor’s office of Education Policy around what data we should
be collecting, how we should be presenting it, how
we share information. That’s just a couple of examples of what we mean when we
talk about policy.
The second role that I have is to coordinate and set
direction for all of the information technology organizations
in the state. We have approximately 130 CIOs, all of whom have their own organizations, some
of them quite small, but some of them good sized. We
believe we have somewhere around 10,000 IT [information technology] state employees.
The third thing we do is, across all of those organizations,
look at some areas that are extremely important for
IT. For instance, technology and enterprise architecture
and the kinds of technology we use, that’s one. The second is way we manage projects. As you
know, there is considerable press every time there
is an IT project issue or a something that didn’t go well, isn’t on time, isn’t on budget.
The third is human capital. About 50 percent of our state employees in IT are going to
be eligible for retirement in the next five years.
We have to find ways to get qualified people to come
to the state to replace those folks.
On top of that, we approve all information technology
projects, from the standpoint of business value, the
way the projects are constructed. So we actually approve
those projects prior to them going to Finance. Finance
actually makes the determination on, are there monies
available.
Is California late in the game in having a CIO? You
worked in Michigan before?
Yes. California, from a history standpoint, they had
a couple of CIOs prior to 2000, then went through a period of about five years where
Clark Kelso was the acting CIO, but without an organization.
There were some issues that the Legislature had with
the prior Dept. of Information Technology, which sunsetted.
It’s kind of embarrassing to be in the home of Silicon
Valley…
That was really Governor Schwarzenegger’s feeling. He very much, in talking particularly with
CEOs in the private sector, they had that conversation.
Most other states, probably 45 out of 50, have CIOs. The leading states, ranked in a survey
called The Digital States Survey, not only did they
have state CIOs, but they were at the Cabinet level,
who reported directly to the governor. That was really
the reason Governor Schwarzenegger felt very strongly
that, just exactly to your point, that California should
have a state CIO and that CIO needed to have a place
in the organization where we could deal with both policy
issues and operational issues.
What are the big technology hurdles facing the state?
If we have a bunch of aging IT professionals, that
suggest to me that we also have of aging IT infrastructure.
That’s exactly right. Interestingly enough, our technology
hurdles aren’t around bringing in the new wiz-bang technology. They’re really around exactly what you’re saying. First of all, we have a large number of
very old systems. Are we unusual? Probably not. I think
most states had the situation. What happened in California
is because there wasn’t a state CIO for a period, there were some renovations
of systems, but certainly not a statewide look at what
needed to be done. So we are sitting with a disproportionate
number of large, very old systems.
What’s the oldest thing you’ve found still operating?
One of them would definitely be the payroll system
that the State Controller’s office runs. It’s got bits of everything. It’s COBAL-based. But some parts of it are in a language that
even I don’t remember, and I’ve been doing this for a very, very long time. The
other thing that happens in IT is that many of these
older systems sprung up and did a single function.
We have small systems spread over many departments.
Some of those systems do the same thing, only in different
ways. What we’ve never really been able to do is take a statewide
view and say that every individual department shouldn’t be creating them. We should be creating them once
for the state.
That’s the project the State Controller’s office has for payroll. There’s a combined effort that the Controller’s office, Dept. of Finance, Treasurer’s office, DGS [Dept. of General Services], a number of organizations around a common budgeting
and accounting project called FI$CAL. And then we’re starting to see microcosms—they’re not small, because nothing in California is small—but for instance, EDD, the Employment Development group,
is working with Health and Human Services on using
a common platform for call centers.
What we’re encouraging is more commonality of the technologies
we use, then using those technologies in more places.
It reduces our cost, it helps us train our people better
for those particular technologies, and it gives us
a much greater ability to have a more stable technology
platform. Then you build things like Fish & Game licenses or tax systems, all the unique things
each department needs, on top of that. And that’s not to say we don’t introduce new technology. But in government, we introduce
it very carefully. What I like to say is, we don’t necessarily go after bleeding edge technology. We
like to be fast followers. We like to see that someone
else has looked at the technology, so it’s something we’re comfortable with.
What are we moving away from and moving towards?
We’re going to be moving away from some of our older mainframe
technologies, running on COBOL. We’re moving definitely towards greater use of open source,
to either a dot-net of Java environment for development. We’re moving towards many more services as self-service. Not only from the standpoint of content, which
is what states have done in the past, but much more
toward everyone expanding the kinds of services that
are available [online] from the Dept. of Motor Vehicles or the Franchise
Tax Board. As the state broadband expands, and as everyone
becomes more computer-literate, they’re going to want to do more services online. They’re not going to want to have to drive to an office
or talk to someone on the phone. A side benefit of
that is it’s much environmentally-friendly and budget-friendly to the state.
Has there been a particularly success project you can
point to?
We’ve have a number of projects that have been successful.
The child support project is the biggest project the
state has ever done. We’re just about to do our final launch in Los Angeles
County. Each of the counties has an office that takes
in the child support payments. And children move or
parents are in a different part of the state, without
a single statewide system, you can’t really track that and get the dollars to the children
that need it. The state had a very distributed system.
This is a project that has been going on for at least
six years to use a single system, a single database.
It also benefits the parents. In many cases, the parents
were making their payments but it might not get to
the children, and they were getting told they hadn’t made their payments.
How closely have you worked with the Secretary of State’s office?
I think we’ve been working with members of Debra Bowen’s office. But most of the things that are related to
elections are federally funded. We always want to make
sure we’re consistent, but most of those things are being done
by her office. She’s always been a very strong technology champion in
the state. She’s actually received a couple of national awards for
her efforts. I think they’ve done quite a bit under her leadership.
